HAS board members voted to clo... HOLLY, Michigan – It was just two years ago that astronomical budget cuts caused members of the Holly Area Schools Board of Education to make the tough decision to close the doors of Sherman Middle School – a move that they said saved the district $345,000 at the time.
As a result, seventh and eighth grade students were transferred to classrooms on the Karl Richter Campus (KRC), while elementary schools expanded to house the district’s sixth graders.
In 2011, the district paid approximately $130,000 to move students, technology and equipment into the various buildings, Assistant Superintendent of Administration, Steve Lenar said.
Pete Deahl thinks it's time to... On Monday, newly elected Trustee Pete Deahl made a pitch to fellow board members as to why he feels the district should undo what’s already been done, and reopen Sherman Middle School.
Deahl used the board’s rules as a framework for his presentation, breaking it into the areas of increasing student achievement, improving the district’s financial status, increasing student enrollment and improving parent involvement.
Student achievement “Mr. (Dave) Nuss has given the board several reports regarding academic achievement and testing, and the results have been mixed at best,” Deahl said, referencing Nuss’ initiative and vision in creating positive momentum within the district.
“Looking at this, it seems that we will need greater flexibility at the elementary level and that assessing the middle school would be beneficial.” Deahl said placing the sixth, seventh and eighth grade students together in one building again would create a cohesive atmosphere for students, and allow the teachers to better collaborate and implement Nuss’ vision.
Improving financial status Deahl acknowledged that the school district’s revenues are based largely on student enrollment. “The board chose implementing cuts as a means to balance the budget,” he said. “There was the hope that closing Sherman Middle School would right-size the district, and save much-needed cash.”
Using the $345,000 figure as a baseline for savings realized in closing Sherman Middle School, Deahl asked a question. “My question is did we really save $345,000 or in the alternative, did it cost us more in student enrollment dollars than the projected savings?” Deahl said the initial projection in 2011 was that HAS would lose approximately 87 students as a result of closing Sherman Middle School.
“The actual loss of students was 296 which as you can see, is 209 students over what was projected,” he said adding that the bigger loss of students could have resulted from the uncertainty parents felt over the possible closing of an elementary school, or the loss of students from the middle school.
“Any way you slice it, it was a negative impact on our enrollment,” he said. “Looking at the math and using the $6,800 per pupil number, we see if we held it to our projected loss, it would have cost us $591,000.” Deahl said the additional loss of 209 students left the district with an additional loss of about $1.4 million, or just over $2 million in total.
“Essentially, we lost more kids than we projected, and consequently, the funding that goes along with them,” he said. Factoring the $345,000 saved in closing Sherman Middle School into the equation still left the district with a loss of about $1.6 million, Deahl said.
Was the economy to blame for declining enrollment? While Deahl said he didn’t doubt that Michigan’s struggling economy played a part in declining enrollment, he wondered how much of a factor it truly was.
“I looked at some of the neighboring districts to see how they fared and while they did have some losses, their numbers did not approach the number of students we lost,” he said.
Deahl said he was particularly interested in seeing that Holly Academy actually increased enrollment. “The academy actually grew substantially in the same (economic) climate,” he said.
Since 2009, Deahl said Holly Area Schools have lost a total of 263 students, a decrease of $1.78 million in funding, while neighboring charter school, Holly Academy, has added 102 students, an increase in revenue of $693,000.
“Looking at the data from a broad or narrow point of view, one has to wonder how much the economy affected enrollment when the academy which draws primarily residents from our district didn’t show a loss, but an increase,” he said. “We have to consider other factors as the drivers to our continued declining enrollment.”
What about KRC? Deahl said moving the students back to Sherman Middle School would create a window of opportunity for the district to possibly share space and costs with other governmental units like the village of Holly or Holly Township. “All involved would be able to share economies of scale, and by working together, it would show the public that they are, in fact, good stewards of their tax dollars,” he said.
Junior Kindergarten and Young 5s Deahl said he was particularly happy to learn that the new junior kindergarten and Young 5s programs have already led to an increase in enrollment.
“It’s only one year, but I’m optimistic, if properly marketed and rolled out into Rose Pioneer (Elementary School), we will continue to see even greater growth,” he said.
Perception of the HAS district How people from other communities perceive the Holly Area School district is problematic, Deahl said. “Unfortunately, the Holly Area School district is not perceived as a destination school district by our own residents, let along those outside of the district,” he said. “The numbers that I have seen are startling.”
Deahl’s research showed that the Holly Area School district continues to lose 506 students to Holly Academy, 368 students to Huron Valley Schools, 59 students to Brandon, and 44 to Clarkston.
The 1,010 students that live in the Holly Area School district, yet attend schools in neighboring districts represents 25 percent of the entire student population, and adds up to nearly $7 million in lost enrollment revenues, Deahl said.
“Perhaps because I’m new to the board, this is old news, but I was very unsettled when I realized that these were our numbers,” he said. “While sobering, I want to emphasize that this perception is not the reality of the hard work and results that our students and teachers achieve – should we choose, we can use this as a catalyst.”
Parental involvement and a ‘credibility gap’ “I respectfully submit that we have a credibility gap,” Deahl said before sharing a couple personal stories with the board about community members who felt they have been duped by the Board of Education.
“I was making small talk with my dental hygienist and I asked her, ‘What do you think about Sherman Middle School?’” he said. “She said, ‘What a shame. All that money wasted.’ In a nutshell, she lost faith in the board and the system.”
In general, Deahl blames the community’s mistrust of the board on last fall’s failure to pass the district’s sinking fund. “She along with the other two thirds of the voters voted it down,” he said of his hygienist. “We do have parental community involvement, but not in the way we want it,” he added. “I don’t have a crystal ball, but I think the next sinking fund is in jeopardy because we are perceived as a system that lacks credibility – 66 percent doesn’t trust us with their tax dollars, and it would seem 25 percent doesn’t trust us with their children.”
Middle School teachers weigh in After visiting with many of the middle school teachers, Deahl said an overwhelming number of them want to move back into Sherman Middle School because of their concerns with academic achievement, the facilities in general and staff and student safety.
Of those he spoke with, Deahl said most believed that isolating sixth graders from a middle school environment does a disservice to the students, and that as a result, it is difficult to pull a class together that is ready for high school in just two years.
Building-wise, Deahl said teachers believe Sherman Middle School offers a much better facility with bigger classrooms, a more adaptable gym, and true science rooms with running water, better equipment and storage.
Deahl said teachers have concerns about safety on the Karl Richter Campus with multiple entry points into the building, a confusing layout, and unknown people routinely roaming the hallways. Additionally, Deahl said the teachers commented on how bus loading and unloading is better designed at Sherman Middle School.
“We have a public that is not inclined to pass our sinking fund,” Deahl said. “ We have 25 percent of our possible student enrollment voting with their feet, we have at best, a moderately hostile governor, we have an empty building that continues to be a source of mistrust, all the while we have dwindling funds with a mandate to increase test scores,” he said. “We can become a destination, and I believe that the first step is to open Sherman Middle School to sixth, seventh and eighth grades.”
Lenar discusses costs of moving back Lenar said aside from moving costs which he estimated will range from $130,000 to $150,000, transportation costs would also add up quickly.
“Transportation as a standalone would add about four more buses, additional driving time and obviously fuel,” Lenar said. “Because of the extra driving time, some of the bus drivers would become fulltime and would most likely become eligible for health insurance,” he added. “When you add those costs up, we’re probably approaching $200,000.”
Since closing its doors in 2011, Lenar said the district has saved about $90,000 per year in utility costs at Sherman Middle School, and noted that reopening it would also boost custodial costs by another $30,000 to $35,000 above and beyond what is already paid for KRC custodial costs.
Further discussion by the board Superintendent Kent Barnes said moving students back to Sherman Middle School could be done, but would result in the district lacking enough funds to carry out Nuss’ proposed initiative.
“My point is very simple – moving back to Sherman is not the singular issue,” Barnes said. “It is a part of the total – it’s not apart from the total.”
While he appreciated hearing Deahl’s thoughts and seeing the data he presented, Barnes said he would be using the days ahead to prepare his thoughts on the issues, and will be sharing them at the next board meeting.
Treasurer Mike Newcomb said the board needs to listen better to what the community wants. “Even on the sinking fund – before it was even voted on, it was overwhelming to hear that people were not supporting it because we put repairs of the Karl Richter building on them,” he said. “That was 15 or 20 years ago but those are the stories I still hear today.”
Newcomb said many of the stakeholders with whom he has spoken are still shocked that Sherman Middle Schools was closed, especially in light of the recent remodeling.
“And we really haven’t discussed the competitor in our back yard at all,” Newcomb said of Holly Academy. “We basically paid for their new addition – we made them stronger and we lost students,” he added. “Either we continue down this path and won’t be able to turn it around after a certain point, or we address it head one and listen to the community.”
The board is expected to vote on the issue at the next regular board meeting on March 25, 2013.
|
Comments
It'd might be interesting to see what data Mr. Deahl used to come up with his idea that it would be economically feasible to reopen the school.
(Later Edit : I'm not saying that I'd like to see the info Mr. Deahl used in a smarmy "I know better"-type of way. I'm genuinely interested in that info).
It is a good sign that property values are coming up (which will equate to more tax dollars coming in). I feel district money would be better spent on supporting instruction and the existing technology we have already invested in before any increase in housing, busing, utilities and custodial expenses are even considered. Are we forgetting we paid experts to come in and give us recommendations on what we should do?
Holly Schools has a dedicated and talented teaching staff. They do wonderful things for students and children in our community everyday, but, they could be doing much more with better support in place.
In my opinion, more teachers, teacher assistants, technology support and smaller class sizes would meet student needs and help test scores improve more effectively than changing the location where classes are held.
Actually I don't have a problem with it at all. When the time comes in the next year or so, I'm going to try and put my kids in the educational environment that I feel is best for them personally. Maybe that's Holly Academy, maybe not; it doesn't mean that I still don't want to see continual improvement in HAS.
I'm not saying I agree or disagree with Mr. Deahl's points but I don't think where he chooses to send his kids is relevant.
I know nothing about Mr. Deahl, how many kids he has or where they go to school but the idea that it's "a conflict of interest" or he's a "mole" trying to take down HAS is just ridiculous talk. ...and the motive behind doing so would be what?
Let's worry about what the best solutions are for improving the schools, not petty personal things like where he chooses to send his kids.
Sherman Middle School becomes :
Village offices...
Township Offices....
Library.....
Youth Center.....
Senior Center....
In other words...one stop Holly Community center. The two buildings in downtown and the old library get sold and turned into professional offices or retail space.
It is a crazy idea that is so crazy it makes perfect sense.
All my children are grown and have left the area, and I don’t have any grandkids that attend Holly Schools, either. But I have to say, I disagree with you on your comments that it is irrelevant that Mr. Deal’s children go to the academy.
For me, it’s the ‘Do as I say, not as I do’ philosophy that bothers me. I don’t know how many kids Mr. Deal has, but for the sake of making it simple, let’s say he has 2 kids. Those children represent nearly $14,000 in enrollment revenue to the district. That may not seem like a lot of money to you, but back in my day, every penny counted. It just seems a bit hypocritical for Mr. Deal to kick up a fuss about losing kids to the academy when he’s contributing to the problem.
The other problem I see with this is that Mr. Deal’s plan is built upon the premise that if you open it, they will come. Mr. Deal believes that if the district spends the $130,000 to $150,000 to move back to Sherman Middle School (and as Mr. Lenar pointed out, moving costs are only a small part of the costs to be gained) the district will magically gain 100 more students. I guess I’ll have to believe that when and if I ever see it.
I’ll be supportive when the board decides unanimously that it makes sense to reopen Sherman Middle School. I’m sure that will happen when the time is right. I just think Mr. Deal is jumping the gun. If it happens, it will have a devastating effect on layoffs and the programs the district can offer to its students, all for the sake of occupying a more updated and comfortable building.
I'm not sure moving back into Sherman solves anything but I do think it's a shame that the building sits vacant especially seeing as money was recently spent on improvements.
I do like some of Tony's ideas for the building assuming the village and township could get together on it and that it made financial sense.
The reason the Academy is able to provide better staffing is because they provide fewer services. In fact, our schools have to provide services for their students if they are pursued and requested.
The playing field is not level. We cannot compete against their test scores. They are able to pick and chose who their students are going to be, public schools cannot. If a child with behavior problems is disruptive to their classrooms....they ask them to leave, public schools cannot. Academy students are responsible for their own transportation and public schools provide transportation. Academy students have no food service, public schools are required to provide food service. I think we should feel very proud of what our public schools accomplish with the challenges they are faced with. Why do people keep trying to establish an elitist society and/or school. America is not an elitist country and was never intended to be one! It is the same old story....let us separate the "haves" from the "have nots". It will not matter where the "have nots" are housed we need to focus on beating the odds and raising our scores.
I agree! Great idea! All things that will help the COMMUNITY and ALL KIDS AND FAMILIES.
Would it be feasible to give a 5 or 10 year lease to these community offices with the agreement they pay all operating and maintenance expenses along with a minimal "rent" payment? This way the school can keep the building...possibly even use some of its office space for public school services..social workers, psychologists, occupational therapists, physical therapists, speech therapists, etc.
If possible, this plan would allow the district to reclaim the building if needed in the future, but relieve the district of financial burden and waste of resources for now. The sale of the other buildings could be invested and buildings for the other community services could be built in the future if the school district does need to reclaim their building. Could be a "win-win"!
Tony E- fabulous ideas!
And ladybug, you are so right. Charter schools are not obligated to take the most challenged students in our community. Public schools are. Add that to transportation and food service, and there is no comparing the costs of running public schools versus charter schools!
You would think Mr. Deahl would understand that, but it's hard to learn when you do more talking than listening.
I agree with this. It doesn't have to be a debate over public schools vs charter schools or where one person may or may not send his kids to school.
How do we improve the product and make it financially stable?
Look at the proposal around moving back to Sherman and evaluate if it helps the above two objectives.
If not, move on and stop worrying about pointless arguments like how many calories are in a lunch at Holly Academy.
Let's not point the finger only at Holly for this pervasive problem concerning online forums where one can use an anonymous userid. Anonymity allows one to be callous and condescending without fear of any sort of reprimand. It happens online ALL THE TIME amongst users that wouldn't even dream of saying the things in person that they type with abandon anonymously on the internet.
Mr. Deahl offered an objective point of view as to the state of the former Sherman Middle School building. I say former because like Pete, I see the unfortunate situation of this building being closed and while I may not necessarily understand all of the facts surrounding the closing and or what it would take to re-open this building, I do see it now as a damn shame it's closed.
What was a constructive article about an objective point a view has become a series of empty and condescending comments directed at Mr. Deahl and Holly Academy.
Is it really the academy's fault that enrollment is down? Have you seen the news since 2005 that caused a mass exodus in the housing market, leaving communities like the Holly Area devastated? Yet, where are the kudos to Holly Academy for not only persevering, but also growing... not because it was stealing enrollments from HAS, because if you ask folks from the academy they will tell you their enrollment is built on families from everywhere - not just Holly. Are those other cities blaming the academy for their declining enrollments? Not likely. They understand the perfect storm that was the worst economy of most of our lifetimes.
Kudos to Pete for having the courage to offer an opinion.
I have the utmost respect for both Superintendent Kent Barnes and Board President Tony Mayhew, and I don't doubt that closing Sherman Middle School was the best decision that could have been made given the very difficult conditions that existed at the time. They certainly did their due diligence, seeking input both from professionals and from residents of the community before taking action.
But what makes Holly so special is that, because it is a small, intimate community, we can have these open discussions about the challenges that face us. We can second-guess ourselves. Every voice can be heard, even those that have reason to remain anonymous. That's a real strength that not many communities have, and I applaud The Holly Express for providing such a forum.
This level of involvement is, perhaps, what I will miss most about Holly.
RSS feed for comments to this post