Chief Rollie Gackstetter. HOLLY, Michigan – In response to Holly Township’s recent invitation to a shared regional services meeting, Holly officials have been hard at work, putting together a plan for potentially consolidating and collaborating on police, fire and EMS services.
At the request of Village President Pete Clemens, Chief of Police Rollie Gackstetter presented the facts of the plan on Aug. 24 to council members for their approval prior to upcoming meeting with Holly , Groveland and Rose township officials.
“At the president’s direction, there has been some discussion since the township’s request, initially signaling that they are going to be looking for opportunities to discuss sharing services – how we can work together, how we can reduce costs, and how we can improve services,” Gackstetter said. Gackstetter said the plan would address the current situation of differing levels of public safety services across the 36 square miles of the township.
Gackstetter said providing public safety is a governmental obligation, and the reason why most government entities exist. “It’s one of the primary reasons the Constitution was written – to establish security for all of us,” he said. “It is a basic tenant and obligation of local, state and federal government.” Coupled with governmental obligation, Gackstetter said residents’ expectations for quality protection and safety also is a key factor.
“Of course we all know the economic conditions that we’re all suffering through right now – the cost of public safety, police, fire and EMS services continues to go up,” he said. With fuel, insurance, training and equipment costs and certain governmental mandates, it adds up to a 3 to 4 percent increase with each passing year, Gackstetter said. “We’ve been hearing a lot over the last 4 or 5 years about how the revenue sources that support those expensive services continue to shrink.” Grant funding, Gackstetter added, isn’t as readily available as it has been in the past, either.
Gackstetter said five different public agencies currently provide police, fire and EMS services to the 10,000 residents living in the 36 square miles of Holly Township, including the Holly police and fire departments, North Oakland County Fire Authority, the Groveland Township Fire Department, and the Michigan State Police. Additionally, Gackstetter said three 911 dispatch centers service the area.
“Depending on where you are and what you’re needing, you may interact with all three of those dispatch centers,” he said.
Gackstetter gave the example of an injury accident along the Holly and Groveland Township corridor of I75. “The current arrangement means if I pick up a cell phone, because of the 911 laws, they point to Holly’s Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP),” he said. “The 911 call from the cell phone comes here to Holly, and in order for us to get ALS (Advanced Life Support) on I75, we tone out Groveland ALS,” he added. “In order to get a fire truck on I75, Oakland County Central Dispatch has to be contacted, and they tone out NOCFA for a fire truck.” Gackstetter said HPD would then have to contact the Michigan State Police Regional Dispatch Center to get a police car on the scene. “For an injury traffic accident on I75, you’ve got all the agencies responding, and all three communication centers trying to deal with the same problem.”
Gackstetter said with so many emergency personnel involved in one incident, agencies run the risk of losing information along the way, and disabling those first responders from disseminating the information in a timely fashion.
The Northwest Oakland County Fire Consolidation Study, a study funded by a grant through Oakland County and completed by Plante and Moran in 2007, Gackstetter says, contains the basic tenants and principles on how to consolidate, how to find efficiencies, and improve services.
After the report’s release, officials from the village of Holly, Holly, Springfield, Rose and Groveland townships began meeting on a monthly basis, discussing ways in which they could share training, combine supply orders, and work together in other ways as described in Phase I of the report.
“As a result of that, the village of Holly began working with Groveland Township to further implement what this study was talking about and what it was recommending,” Gackstetter said. Gackstetter said one of the key elements to making it work was improving the situation with economy of scale, or that is, spreading the unit cost over more users, thereby effectively lowering the cost of the service for everyone.
Prior to collaborating with Groveland Township, Gackstetter said Holly’s fire department had an operating cost of $357,504, no ambulance service and no real plan of what to do about it, and an ISO rating of 7. Gackstetter explained that a community’s ISO rating – that is how well a community responds in terms of fire-fighting capabilities – is a big factor in home insurance costs. “The 1 rating is the highest, and 10 is the worst,” Gackstetter said. “And we were a 7.” Gackstetter said at that time, the village’s cost recovery, or that is costs recouped from insurance agencies, amounted to $7,291.
Since collaborating with Groveland Township, Gackstetter said the operating budget has decreased by approximately $100,000 to $257,270, and that the village now offers both Basic Life Support and Advanced Life Support ambulance service. Additionally, the village’s ISO rating has sunk to a 5, saving village residents a conservative estimate of $200,000 per year in insurance costs. Revenue recovery for 2010 now stands at $29,305 – a 400 percent increase over the costs recovered in 2007, he said.
Gackstetter turned his attention to the police department, telling council members that his department has a very solid foundation. “I would put us up against anybody in the county or in the state as far as our training regimen, the staff capabilities, the equipment that we have available to us, the technology and systems we have implemented – I’d put us up against anybody,” he said. “But we’re facing some funding challenges.”
Gackstetter said he believes a collaborative plan for the police department, much like the ongoing collaborative efforts between the village of Holly and Groveland Township fire departments, is a good idea.
“You could use the cost of those savings to help solve the police needs with the dollars you currently have,” Gackstetter said. “Perhaps the current Holly Township fire expenditures may pay for both police and fire services in the township, depending on how well we collaborate and how well the systems work, but it will at least take the edge off, and you would have other options as far as how you deal with police issues in the township.”
“We are faced with declining revenues, and we are faced with increased costs,” Clemens said following Gackstetter’s presentation. “Holly Township is faced with a less than adequate police force and it’s an opportunity for us all to work together to save money, to provide a service that Holly Township needs, and to provide revenue for the village of Holly.”
With council’s unanimous approval, Gackstetter will make the presentation to Holly, Groveland and Rose township officials during the regional shared services meeting to be held at 6:30 p.m. on Sept. 23 at the North Oakland County Fire Authority Station 1, 5051 Grange Hall Road.
|
Comments
We would also have to look at the impact that disincorporating the village would have on tax payers. Without considering the granular details disincorporation may seem like an obvious decision but there is a reason the Michigan Municipal League looks at disincorporation as "similar to going the wrong way on a one-way street."
Any municipal change whether it is cityhood or dissolving the village and becoming just a township should only be done with the advice of experts and with the approval of the majority of the residents that it affects.
Am I correct still?
Mr. Clemens, if we finally get to become The City of the Village of Holly (which would be the current village and current township of Holly), we would have ONE governing body, ONE set of taxes (as opposed to Village residents currently paying Village AND township taxes), and ONE set of emergency services...HOW IS ANYONE AGAINST THIS?!
If the entire township were to incorporate as a 36 square mile city, what would happen to the effective tax rates of the former village residents and outer-township residents? If tax rates are the only consideration, then I'd be interested in seeing "before" and "after" figures.
Am I also right in believing that water rates for customers of Village water/sewer would not change, because no new users would be added to the system?
Seems to me that the most optimal situation is that the Village incorporate as a city within its current boundaries to capture the greatest share of State revenue sharing (and hopefully reducing the effective tax rate for "city" residents). This would come at a cost to outer-township residents.
The problem is that some of the highest valued properties and areas of valuable density within Holly Township are not within the Village limits, and should the Village incorporate as a City without annexing them in the process, it will be difficult to do so in the future and the "city" would sacrifice a healthy revenue source. Yet, I doubt those property owners would willingly agree to multiplying their tax rates to join the "city".
Seems like a very complex situation.
Perhaps we weren’t as clear as we needed to be in our presentation so let me alter your summation a bit. The model that was created to be presented at the regional consolidation meeting provides for the Holly Village/Groveland fire collaborative to provide fire and EMS services to Holly Township, Groveland Township, and Holly Village. Holly Police would provide police services to Holly Township as well as the village. We believe that we can offer this service to Holly Township residents for the exact same amount of money that the township currently pays for fire and EMS services alone. We further believe that we can recreate this model and apply it to other local municipalities as well, but for now we are only focusing on Holly Township as we see this as the most logical first step.
Much like the T.E.A. party movement that is changing the landscape of politics in America today, the cityhood movement needs only a time and a place for interested citizens to gather and begin talking about the process. I hesitate to be the face of the movement because as a council member the opposition will use their timeworn argument that “the only people interested in cityhood sit on the Village Council” and that “Council only wants to pursue cityhood so they can raise taxes”, but I will be the movements biggest supporter and most vocal cheerleader.
My opinion is based on a simple principle that it seems like one city's government and services could more efficiently accommodate the needs of the entire Holly area than two separate government entities duplicating their efforts and duplicating their costs. Seems silly, given all that we are seeing in today's economy to keep evading this possible solution and next great chapter in the Holly Area's growth.
I could only hope to see some serious discussion about this someday in the near future. Regardless of what has happened in the past, I believe it's time to seriously take another look at this.
Nevertheless, no actual numbers have been presented. When the townships and the village get together to discuss shared services, I'm sure a number of scenarios will be discussed.
In the case of the Village and Groveland fire/EMS handling the township, what happens to NOCFA? Does it get absorbed into the village fire?
As for Chief Gackstetter leaving Holly in the same shape as he left Pontiac, I guess you'll have to explain what you mean by that.
RSS feed for comments to this post