|
HOLLY, Michigan – The burning question in Holly these days seems to be what to do about the vacant Downtown Development Authority director position, but after the March 8 DDA Board of Directors meeting, the decision is still up for debate.
Last week, Village President Pete Clemens said Village Manager Marsha Powers would be assuming the duties of Holly’s DDA director and putting the $28,000 to $32,000 in director wages back into the village’s general fund.
Before Monday’s meeting, Powers emailed Robert Donohue, program coordinator for the Main Street Oakland County, asking him if there are other communities in which village or city managers serve as the DDA director, augmenting daily and event operations with an event coordinator or staff position. His response wasn’t the one most villagers expected to hear.
Powers included a copy of Donohue’s email responses in DDA board member packets for their review.
“At this time, none of the 11 MSOC communities have city managers serving as the DDA executive director,” Donohue wrote. Donohue said in the past, city employees for Royal Oak, Lake Orion and Walled Lake had served in that capacity while the DDAs for those communities hired a separate DDA downtown manager. “Many negative issues developed and the National Trust and the National Main Street Center advised us not to do that any longer.”
Donohue said the Main Street Program is a nationally trademarked program of the National Trust for Historic Preservation (NTHP) in Washington D.C. and that it’s their requirement that the Main Street Manager/DDA executive director for communities numbering more than 5,000 residents be full-time.
Having a contract with the NTHP, Donohue said MSOC must follow all of the same criteria the village of Holly must follow during their yearly accreditation evaluations, most specifically the seventh criteria that requires hiring a full-time DDA executive director/Main Street manager whose sole focus is the DDA/ downtown.
In light of the economic downturn, however, Donohue said MSOC has utilized some flexibility by developing a “Flexible Full-Time” position.
“Flexible Full-Time, in our opinion as we apply it to our MSOC communities, is when the DDA executive director/Main Street manager clearly is paid for less than 40 hours, but in actuality, with evening meetings and events, weekend events, and unscheduled necessary daily meetings that may occur over a one-year period, the average for the whole year is easily over 40 hours or more per week,” Donohue wrote. “Given that scenario, we have MSOC managers/DDA executive directors who are hired as ‘part time’ at 25 hours per week, who actually work 35 to 50 hours per week although they’re only getting paid for 25 hours.”
Donohue said if Holly hires a part-time DDA executive director using the criteria he described, paying $15 to $20 per hour, and ensuring that the sole focus of that individual is the DDA, not an additional title to shared responsibilities for an existing village employee, MSOC would consider the position “flexible full-time” for their purposes and as well as the national trademark requirements.
“We want Holly to keep up the momentum for downtown and have a comprehensive, community-involved system (Main Street) in place to continue to maximize the economic and tax generating potential of the entire DDA,” Donohue wrote. Donohue said the “flexible full-time” status could remain in place until such a time the economy turns around, giving Holly officials the opportunity to return the DDA executive director back to full-time status. “We certainly want to do everything we can to allow Holly to remain part of the MSOC Program, however, without such a person, Holly would not be eligible to participate under the terms now in place.”
During Monday’s meeting, John Winglemire, DDA board chairman broached the topic with board members.
“With applicants and resumes and now that we know that our budget is going to be cut, maybe we’re gong to have to look into a part-time director,” he said. “We wanted a full-time, but there are different descriptions of what a part-time and full-time director can do,” he added while referring to Donohue’s email. “There are a lot of options.”
“I make the motion that we keep it tabled until we find out exactly what the village is going to need from us and decide what to do from there,” board member Marty Lorenz said. With that, fellow board member Lisa Clark seconded the motion.
Unanimously, all board members agreed to table the issue.
Powers said the village of Holly’s Main Street accreditation for 2009 was recently renewed in January, and that renewal for 2010 is slated for January of 2011.
|
Comments
My disappointment, and that's all it is, stems from the fact that there was very little debate, discussion or real consideration at all (at least in public), yet there were lengthy discussions on issues that, in my opinion, don't significantly contribute to "downtown development" or economic progress. I'll live with a "no" vote any day, as long as it was the product of vigorous, thoughtful and broad-based debate.
I respect the time and effort of all of the people who volunteer for boards, commissions, and organizations, as well as everyone who contributes their input and opinions. Beyond that, though, the DDA is comprised of tax-paying business owners who are not just volunteers, but public servants and stewards of our community's economy. The board membership is mostly restricted to district business owners, and the board must represent the *development* of the entire district and all aspects of the DDA's role and mission.
If you want pretty flowers, then you need to plant the seeds in fertile soil. Otherwise you just get weeds and are left admiring other gardens.
I am willing to help with whatever I can to get these surveys out and I have made that pretty clear. I am sure that there are many others with the same view.
What I think does deserve criticism is the decisions being made and what they are being based on. Does the board truly think it has a grasp on what the community wants? On what direction the community wishes Holly to move towards? If so, how do they know? What tools have they used to come to their conclusion? Is the overall economic progression of Holly truly what is being represented or just the few blocks that are considered the historic downtown? Why is there so little discussion about a market survey in comparison to flower pots?
I think these are all fair questions and real concerns. Bringing them out in the open will also help to generate future volunteers for board positions.
Will McKay's Hardware, or Little Caesar's, or Beacon and Bridge be receiving flower pots? Are there plans to build a gateway arch over the driveway to Holly Foods? They're all in the DDA and pay taxes into it, but I'm not personally certain what benefits the "uptown" businesses get vis-a-vis the historic downtown.
I have a feeling that if there isn't a DDA director and our Main Street project tragically dissolves, there are plenty of businesses in Holly that wouldn't notice the difference anyway.
It was rather shocking to me that the DDA board did not discuss this possibility at their meeting Monday night. Neither did they attend the village budget work session last week to advocate for their budget or for the importance of the director's position.
Mr. Hilty offered many suggestions for the design of the park that may eventually be built across Broad Street from his store. He reminded the group that Main Street Oakland County would provide design services free of charge. I do not recall any discussion of the fact that this is exactly the type of service that will no longer be available to the DDA should they be forced out of the Main Street program due to non-compliance with the requirement of having a director.
Mrs. Montooth gave us all a very lengthy lecture on the importance of fertilizer and water to the potted plants provided to downtown merchants by the DDA. There was not, however, a discussion of the relative importance of the flower pot budget to the maintenance of the director's position.
RSS feed for comments to this post