Tuesday, February 7th 2012
 

Latest Comments

RSS

No director, no program: Holly DDA director position tabled

Print
Written by Amy Mayhew
Tuesday, March 09 2010

HOLLY, Michigan – The burning question in Holly these days seems to be what to do about the vacant Downtown Development Authority director position, but after the March 8 DDA Board of Directors meeting, the decision is still up for debate.

Last week, Village President Pete Clemens said Village Manager Marsha Powers would be assuming the duties of Holly’s DDA director and putting the $28,000 to $32,000 in director wages back into the village’s general fund.

Before Monday’s meeting, Powers emailed Robert Donohue, program coordinator for the Main Street Oakland County, asking him if there are other communities in which village or city managers serve as the DDA director, augmenting daily and event operations with an event coordinator or staff position. His response wasn’t the one most villagers expected to hear.


Powers included a copy of Donohue’s email responses in DDA board member packets for their review.

“At this time, none of the 11 MSOC communities have city managers serving as the DDA executive director,” Donohue wrote. Donohue said in the past, city employees for Royal Oak, Lake Orion and Walled Lake had served in that capacity while the DDAs for those communities hired a separate DDA downtown manager. “Many negative issues developed and the National Trust and the National Main Street Center advised us not to do that any longer.”

Donohue said the Main Street Program is a nationally trademarked program of the National Trust for Historic Preservation (NTHP) in Washington D.C. and that it’s their requirement that the Main Street Manager/DDA executive director for communities numbering more than 5,000 residents be full-time.

Having a contract with the NTHP, Donohue said MSOC must follow all of the same criteria the village of Holly must follow during their yearly accreditation evaluations, most specifically the seventh criteria that requires hiring a full-time DDA executive director/Main Street manager whose sole focus is the DDA/ downtown.

In light of the economic downturn, however, Donohue said MSOC has utilized some flexibility by developing a “Flexible Full-Time” position.

“Flexible Full-Time, in our opinion as we apply it to our MSOC communities, is when the DDA executive director/Main Street manager clearly is paid for less than 40 hours, but in actuality, with evening meetings and events, weekend events, and unscheduled necessary daily meetings that may occur over a one-year period, the average for the whole year is easily over 40 hours or more per week,” Donohue wrote. “Given that scenario, we have MSOC managers/DDA executive directors who are hired as ‘part time’ at 25 hours per week, who actually work 35 to 50 hours per week although they’re only getting paid for 25 hours.”

Donohue said if Holly hires a part-time DDA executive director using the criteria he described, paying $15 to $20 per hour, and ensuring that the sole focus of that individual is the DDA, not an additional title to shared responsibilities for an existing village employee, MSOC would consider the position “flexible full-time” for their purposes and as well as the national trademark requirements.

“We want Holly to keep up the momentum for downtown and have a comprehensive, community-involved system (Main Street) in place to continue to maximize the economic and tax generating potential of the entire DDA,” Donohue wrote. Donohue said the “flexible full-time” status could remain in place until such a time the economy turns around, giving Holly officials the opportunity to return the DDA executive director back to full-time status.  “We certainly want to do everything we can to allow Holly to remain part of the MSOC Program, however, without such a person, Holly would not be eligible to participate under the terms now in place.”

During Monday’s meeting, John Winglemire, DDA board chairman broached the topic with board members.

“With applicants and resumes and now that we know that our budget is going to be cut, maybe we’re gong to have to look into a part-time director,” he said. “We wanted a full-time, but there are different descriptions of what a part-time and full-time director can do,” he added while referring to Donohue’s email. “There are a lot of options.”

“I make the motion that we keep it tabled until we find out exactly what the village is going to need from us and decide what to do from there,” board member Marty Lorenz said. With that, fellow board member Lisa Clark seconded the motion.

Unanimously, all board members agreed to table the issue.

Powers said the village of Holly’s Main Street accreditation for 2009 was recently renewed in January, and that renewal for 2010 is slated for January of 2011.


Comments  

 
0 #1 Kim Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
Darrin - I love your idea. Talk about a win win! You've contributed a ton to these forums over the past several months, along with my other favorite commentor Jason, keep the great ideas coming!
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #2 Darrin Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
Can local businesses be solicited to chip in, and in return, have a ad or "sponsored by" section be included with their respective logos?
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #3 Jason Hughes Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
I have to admit I was a bit critical in my first response in the other article. I am not a saint by any means and I apologize Mr. Winglemire. I still don't think it is fair for to claim that the DDA wasn't involved in the survey project or imply that there wasn't opportunity to be involved.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #4 Ryan Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
I will assure everyone that there are no sour grapes on my end. I like to think of myself as reasonable and rational, and if the DDA were to prioritize other avenues of economic and business development over a survey, then that's certainly their prerogative and leaves little room for more than a disagreement on approach.

My disappointment, and that's all it is, stems from the fact that there was very little debate, discussion or real consideration at all (at least in public), yet there were lengthy discussions on issues that, in my opinion, don't significantly contribute to "downtown development" or economic progress. I'll live with a "no" vote any day, as long as it was the product of vigorous, thoughtful and broad-based debate.

I respect the time and effort of all of the people who volunteer for boards, commissions, and organizations, as well as everyone who contributes their input and opinions. Beyond that, though, the DDA is comprised of tax-paying business owners who are not just volunteers, but public servants and stewards of our community's economy. The board membership is mostly restricted to district business owners, and the board must represent the *development* of the entire district and all aspects of the DDA's role and mission.

If you want pretty flowers, then you need to plant the seeds in fertile soil. Otherwise you just get weeds and are left admiring other gardens.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #5 Darrin Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
Volunteerism is good and we need more of it. But I don't see anyone criticizing these board members on a personal level. All opinions are directed at actions, decisions, and issues...all matters which are open for debate. The survey decision, which I personally disagree with, is only one example, but to neatly compartmentalize all dissenters as simply 'those crazy survey folks' really overlooks the bigger picture. Jason gets it right...are the board members on the same page as the rest of Holly? Do they even care if they are or aren't? And in the cases where they're not (which can happen, but should be rare), what's the justification? Those are the larger questions.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #6 Cathy Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
I don't think anyone is chastising the DDA Board. It's a matter of if they thought it through what happens to the design service and everything else the Main Street program provides. If you read the details what is required of a DDA Director in order to keep in line with the Main Street Program it's more than what has been told..read the fine print. Therefore, the program may be pulled out from under us before anyone knows it. There are many people in this town that have been volunteering for yrs. it is greatly appreciated. With that said it doesn't mean we can't question how things are done by those that have power over many issues.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #7 Jason Hughes Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
Vera, I agree that it does sound like sour grapes and I am sure it is to some extent. Yes volunteers should be commended, but when it comes to making decisions that affect the entire community the voices of those affected should be heard.

I am willing to help with whatever I can to get these surveys out and I have made that pretty clear. I am sure that there are many others with the same view.

What I think does deserve criticism is the decisions being made and what they are being based on. Does the board truly think it has a grasp on what the community wants? On what direction the community wishes Holly to move towards? If so, how do they know? What tools have they used to come to their conclusion? Is the overall economic progression of Holly truly what is being represented or just the few blocks that are considered the historic downtown? Why is there so little discussion about a market survey in comparison to flower pots?

I think these are all fair questions and real concerns. Bringing them out in the open will also help to generate future volunteers for board positions.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #8 Goodman Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
Decisions are often made tougher by those who donââà ƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…¡Ã‚¬Ã ¢ÃƒÂ¢Ã¢â€šÂ¬Ã…¾Ã‚¢t know how to make them.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #9 Vera Hogan Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
I think it's important to rememmber that members of the DDA Board also are volunteers. In addition, some members also volunteer their time and expertise to other community groups and activities. They should be commended for their efforts, not chastised for making what I am sure are difficult decisions. If you don't like the decisions they make, step up and put your application in to serve on the board as their terms expire. This all sounds like sour grapes over the board's decision not to fund the survey postage. You may not like it, but it was their decision to make. Time to move on and brainstorm other ways to pay for the postage if it's that important. Has anyone approached the postmaster to find out if it is even going to cost that much for a reply device?
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #10 Darrin Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
It's unfortunate that we can't afford a Director for 2010. But...I get it from a financial standpoint. The biggest downside, however, is that there isn't anyone capable currently in a position of authority to perform double duty and carry out Director responsibilities in a positive way. Judging but recent actions, decisions, and comments...there is a complete void of leadership, talent, and common sense.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #11 Ryan Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
I'm curious what the "uptown" merchants and businesses think about the current situation. Holly is unusual in that our DDA district stretches from the railroad tracks to Sherman Middle School--not just the "historic" downtown.

Will McKay's Hardware, or Little Caesar's, or Beacon and Bridge be receiving flower pots? Are there plans to build a gateway arch over the driveway to Holly Foods? They're all in the DDA and pay taxes into it, but I'm not personally certain what benefits the "uptown" businesses get vis-a-vis the historic downtown.

I have a feeling that if there isn't a DDA director and our Main Street project tragically dissolves, there are plenty of businesses in Holly that wouldn't notice the difference anyway.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #12 Cathy Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
At this rate, not to be a pessimist but it's no wonder people burn out with these meetings and don't attend. Maybe in the past, discussing some of these subjects should take precedence but with the huge possibility of losing such a valuable program (MainStreet) I think the focus should be on that subject. Seems to me, people are putting the cart before the horse! We won't have any designs or flower pots to worry about watering. Needless to say, grants and anything else a DDA Director provides.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #13 Janet Leslie Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
My understanding of the village council's budget discussions last week is that they discussed not hiring a DDA director within the next year and leaving only $20,000 in the DDA budget for 2010-2011. it seems to me it is not a matter of whether the DDA director will be full time or part time, but will there be a director at all?

It was rather shocking to me that the DDA board did not discuss this possibility at their meeting Monday night. Neither did they attend the village budget work session last week to advocate for their budget or for the importance of the director's position.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #14 Janet Leslie Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
I do not mean to imply that the DDA board had no meaningful discussions at their meeting Monday.

Mr. Hilty offered many suggestions for the design of the park that may eventually be built across Broad Street from his store. He reminded the group that Main Street Oakland County would provide design services free of charge. I do not recall any discussion of the fact that this is exactly the type of service that will no longer be available to the DDA should they be forced out of the Main Street program due to non-compliance with the requirement of having a director.

Mrs. Montooth gave us all a very lengthy lecture on the importance of fertilizer and water to the potted plants provided to downtown merchants by the DDA. There was not, however, a discussion of the relative importance of the flower pot budget to the maintenance of the director's position.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #15 Cathy Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
So does this mean we are on the verge of losing our Main Street Program and does the DDA Board realize this is a very real possibility? Do they read the information given to them thoroughly to understand all we would lose without Main Street Program/DDA Director? In the long run it sounds like we are in big trouble without a Director. Seems like there is way more to lose than what people understand.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #16 Jason Hughes Tuesday, February 07 2012 11:47am
Has anyone considered the type of talent that we are going to get from a "part-time" director that works more than 40 hours a week? I know there are some very dedicated individuals out there, but I think this is a very real consideration.
Report to administrator
 

To comment on this article, please register for an account or log-in if you already have an account.

 



Front Page | Community | Sports and Outdoors | Opinion | Education | Holly Express | Site Map
©2012 The Holly Express.
Send feedback to Editor@theHollyExpress.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be broadcast, published, rewritten or redistributed without prior written permission.