Friday, May 24th 2013
 

More Area News

Township officials allocate general fund monies for Academy Road sidewalk

Print
Written by Anna Troppens
Saturday, October 20 2012

Township officials voted in fa...

HOLLY TOWNSHIP, Michigan - Holly Township is getting its first municipal sidewalk.

After a lengthy discussion and a 3-2 vote, the board approved building the first sidewalk Holly Township will own — 160-feet on the south side of Academy Road across and just east of Holly Academy.

Following two board-issued request for proposal, township officials awarded the work to the only bidder on the project, Stilwell Construction, at $6,400.

Some board members have reservations about the project, while parents of students say the sidewalk is badly needed.


Darlene McAninch, a parent of three children who walk daily to Holly Academy, said it’s important to get the sidewalk to reach all the way to the school crosswalk across Academy Road, something that would require another 350 feet of sidewalk in addition to the 160-feet approved by the board.

With no place to pull over and no traffic light on Academy Road, McAninch said she worries about children’s safety, and hoped the township board could help in making the area more viable for children who walk to school.

Resident Richard Rossell said, in his opinion, the township is liable if it doesn't lay a sidewalk. The safety of children is involved, and if someone is hurt, there would be a lawsuit, he said.

Several residents of the River...


Ken Kander, director of finance and operations for Holly Academy and a resident, spoke in support of the sidewalk. Kander said about 25 students live across the street from the school, and Holly Academy’s administrative team all supports having the section of sidewalk built. Even though construction of the segment still doesn’t complete the sidewalk, 160-feet of sidewalk is “better than nothing,” he said.

Parent Kevin Emmons agreed. His family has one child attending Holly Academy now, and two more who will attend when they're old enough. Emmons said he can walk the area without sidewalk, but little ones and the elderly struggle.

Board members discussed using some of the $55,000 in bond monies left to the township when the developer, Silverman, failed to complete the development. There are legal questions about how Holly Township can draw from the fund, Clerk Karin Winchester said, adding that public improvements are supposed to be assessed to the properties that actually reap the benefits of the improvements.

Holly Township initially received the piece of land the sidewalk will be on as a donation from the developer of the nearby Pulte subdivision. Winchester said the developer thought it would be a great location for a township hall, but the idea never came to fruition. If the township uses taxpayer dollars to construct the sidewalk on the property, Winchester said the township will never be able to gift the land back to the subdivision. Winchester said the board had recently discussed listing the property for sale, and adding $6,400 of improvements would have to be passed onto the purchaser. Currently, Winchester said those properties are not selling anywhere close to $6,400.

Additionally, Winchester has concerns with the way the project relates to Public Act 188 of 1954, an act that provides for townships making public improvements, such as sidewalks.

“I feel we need a legal opinion to see if the township is exempt from that act just because it owns the property,” Winchester said. “If the township didn’t own the property, the act would apply and there would be a process, including public hearings that the township would be required to follow to make that improvement.”

The township board approved using money from its general services funding, which has $20,962 available, Lambert said.

Lambert said the township can contract with the village of Holly Department of Public Works for clearing the sidewalk in the winter, or seek an independent contractor for it.

In a vote of 3-2, Lambert’s motion passed with Winchester and Treasurer Mark Freeman casting the dissenting votes.

“Safety of our residents is number one and I completely agree there should be sidewalks to any school, but we cannot overlook following proper procedure and the law,” Winchester said later. “It concerns me that this was being pushed through with open disregard for some board members’ concerns,” she added. “There was no reason that action could not have been postponed until the board had all of the necessary information it needed to make its decision.”

The 160-feet long sidewalk wil...

The bottom line, Winchester said, is adding the extra 160-feet of sidewalk still does not solve the safety problem, and the project has not yet been approved by the Road Commission of Oakland County for the installation in the road’s right of way.

After the meeting, McAninch said there needs to be more than the section of sidewalk the board approved.

“It needs to be functioning like any other schools would be functioning, with a sidewalk going the whole way to school,” she said.

There are 900 families whose children attend Holly Academy, and each family is responsible for getting their child to and from school.

“There is major mayhem at the school for dismissal and drop off and pickup,” McAninch said. “You have to rely on the cars to stop, and lots of them are in a hurry. There have been close calls.”


Comments   

 
#1 epease3088 2012-10-20 20:07
I am somewhat relieved that a stretch of sidewalk will be added, but it's not long enough. I have prayed for the children (parents too) who try to walk or ride their bikes to Holly Academy (or Adelphian Academy) on Academy Rd. The children must cross twice in heavy traffic to get to school. Example: A child is walking to school from town on the sidewalk which is on the the north side of Academy Rd. The north sidewalk ends, and the children have to cross Academy Rd. to the south side where the sidewalk starts. When the sidewalk ends on the south side, the children must cross Academy Rd. AGAIN to get to the schools which are both on the north side of Academy Rd. Dangerous and confusing? Yes! There should be one continuous sidewalk on the north side of Academy Rd so no one has to cross the road to get to school. That is my two cents worth!
Report to administrator
 
 
#2 Linus 2012-10-21 07:42
So Silverman left $55,000 for the community to use when they left us high and dry on the water and sewer. How about using that money to pay off some of the water and sewer debt to lower the costs for everyone? We made the upgrades mainly to accommodate the Silverman project, seems like it is the least that could be done.
Report to administrator
 
 
#3 Jesse Lambert 2012-10-21 08:59
This particular project represents work that can be completed within Holly Township's own authoritative structure (Board of Trustees, administration).

The reminder of the parcels leading up to Holly Academy are all owned by residents, thus changing the process used to regulate and construct a safety path.

If residents along Academy Road show interest in extending a safety path towards the school, alternative measures will need to be sought out.

The bond money left over by Silverman/Pulte cannot be used to pay down water/sewer debt. The monies left may be used to fulfill unmet infrastructure requirements.

The $55,000 in bond money represents a small drop in the bucket to the overall level of water/sewer debt. Even if the money was applied to the enterprise fund, it would not have a substantial impact on what we currently pay as users.
Report to administrator
 
 
#4 epease3088 2012-10-21 11:24
Thank you, Mr. Lambert, for giving us information about what could be done to extend a safety path towards the school on Academy Road.

Sounds like a project for the Holly Academy PTO and interested persons to tackle. Safety is a priority.
Report to administrator
 
 
#5 Lee 2012-10-22 04:28
Jesse, If the $55,000 was meant for "infrasructure" requirements, what does that refer to if not the water/sewer lines? If it IS for sewer lines, then isn't the Village entitled to this money? Any monies recooped to help reduce these expenses would be helpful..
Report to administrator
 
 
#6 Ryan Bladzik 2012-10-22 06:36
Lee, infrastructure is roads, sidewalks, medians/shoulders, utility lines, pipes/drains/mains, or anything else that needs to be "built" or "installed" to complete the subdivision.

These are the kinds of projects that improve the quality of life throughout the community, and I'm glad to see the Township moving forward on this.
Report to administrator
 
 
#7 Lee 2012-10-22 08:35
RYAN, THANK YOU FOR answering for Jesse...I also am glad the Township is moving ahead on this, but now wonder why then not using the #55,000 for the sidewalks instead of GF monies.. I realize they need sidewalks, no problem.
Report to administrator
 
 
#8 C. Rankin 2012-10-22 11:13
While it seems odd that the sidewalk would have been left 160 feet short of the property line when it was originally built, for the Township to now add that 160 feet only to have it dead end in a stand of trees seems equally odd. They are literally building the sidewalk to nowhere. There aren't any real safety improvements to be had by taking a sidewalk that ends at nothing and extending it so that it still ends at nothing, unless they are trying to avoid a potential lawsuit from someone twisting an ankle on the uneven ground at the end of the existing sidewalk. (Which isn't an actual safety improvement, but it's an improvement in the township's legal position). I think that the Township would have been better served by postponing the contruction until a concensus can be reached regarding the addtional 350 feet that needs to be built to actually make the sidewalk useful. It will certainly cost more to build this 160-foot section now, and then later building the additional 350-foot section, than it would to build the entire 510-foot section at one time.
Report to administrator
 
 
#9 Frank Sweeney 2012-10-22 13:24
Who owns the property that begins on the other side of the new sidewalk? Does the township also own that? If it is owned by residents, then wouldn't they have to pay individual assessments to get the rest of the sidewalk installed? If that's the case, let's hope they are sympathetic to the plight of those students and family members who routinely walk to Holly Academy. Otherwise C. Rankin is right. It will literally be a sidewalk to nowhere.
Report to administrator
 
 
#10 Ann 2012-10-22 20:17
Applause Mr Lambert for being prepared and pushing this through with the help of Trustee Ruth and Leslie.


I have no children attending in Holly Area Schools or the Academy but know we need to do what we can to provide a safe route to and from school for our kids. We needed to start somewhere with this project and it was up to the Township to take the lead and do what is right.


The census shoes we have 3,733 households in Holly Township, without taking business tax revenue into account the cost we will pay for this project is $1.74 per household (yes one dollar and seventy four cents per household) and well worth the peace of mind in my book.


As for the water issue, that's a whole different issue and for some reason the issue keeps working it's way into any conversation that involves money. This problem has been blamed on the Pulte development when in reality, no one held a gun at the head of the Village Government saying "turn over the water/sewer or else". It was the village that made the decision to allow this and failed to obtaining enough funds for the improvements necessary to accommodate the additional residents.
Report to administrator
 
 
#11 circus011574 2012-10-23 10:03
I agree that a sidewalk is needed if kids are walking to school, but to do only 30% of it with no plan to complete the other 70% seems rather silly. I wonder why only one company bid on the job? The price seems reasonable but it should be standard to get at least 3 quotes.
Report to administrator
 
 
#12 Two50r22 2012-10-23 11:00
This is surprising, looks like Lambert and friends got a few lessons from the village council. Shoot first and ask questions later. Thank God Winchester and Freeman got re-elected.
Report to administrator
 
 
#13 hollyshopper 2012-10-23 12:27
Well said, Ann.
Report to administrator
 
 
#14 localyokel 2012-10-24 11:13
That sidewalk to nowhere is ridiculous. If you cant complete the entire thing why do it at all? The kids will still be crossing to the school without a sidewalk. As another commenter pointed out, the sidewalk already jumps from one side of the road to the other. It is not a safe place for kids to walk alone and adding a $55k piece of concrete that still doesnt get the job done is another waste of township funds. This is just another piece of the fall out for a badly inked deal with Silverman/Pulte. I hope Village voters will remember this when going to the polls in a couple weeks. Jeff Miller was the one involved in these deals and look at what we have to show for it. An water system we cant afford, a divided community (did you know the Preserve of Riverside sub has some homes that are village and some that are township - in the same sub! what a nightmare that is), and sidewalks that lead to nowhere...what a joke.
Report to administrator
 

To comment on this article, please register for an account or log-in if you already have an account.

 



Front Page | Community | Sports and Outdoors | Opinion | Education | Holly Express | Site Map
©2013 The Holly Express.
Send feedback to Editor@theHollyExpress.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be broadcast, published, rewritten or redistributed without prior written permission.