Former Chief, Elena Danishevsk... HOLLY, Michigan – It's taken at least five months and cost more than $16,000 in legal fees, but on Tuesday evening, Village Attorney Richard Figura gave village officials the green light to release a lengthy investigative report, detailing former Police Chief Elena Danishevskaya’s sexual harassment complaint against two village employees and one councilman.
On Aug. 30, Danishevskaya was placed on paid administrative leave following the village’s receipt of a “Vote of No Confidence” letter from 12 members of the Holly Police Officers’ Union. Danishevskaya rejected the letter and resigned on Sept. 5, maintaining that she was placed on paid administrative leave in retaliation for the sexual harassment complaint she filed in March.
Danishevskaya’s Complaint Danishevskaya’s sexual harassment complaint was filed on March 3, 2012, and names Holly Village Councilman Tom Clark, Village Manager, Jerry Walker, and Clerk/Treasurer Cathy Behrens in 21 separate allegations of sexual harassment.
Instead of enlisting the help of a neighboring police agency to investigate the matter, Figura honored Danishevskaya’s request that a mutual third party conduct the investigation. As a result, Gregory T. Gibbs, an attorney in Flint, served in that capacity, conducting the investigation and submitting a 150-page factual account of his findings in August.
Allegations against Clark Clark is at the center of nine of Danishevskaya’s 21 allegations in her complaint.
Clark was elected to the Holly Village Council in 2010, and served as member of the panel tasked with finding a new police chief following former Chief Rollie Gackstetter’s departure in December of 2010.
One of Danishevskaya’s allegations against Clark relates to an incident that occurred during an overnight conference in Mt. Pleasant in which Clark had asked Danishevskaya to attend so that she could replace him as a member of the Michigan Township Participating Plan Law Enforcement committee.
“On Friday, 6/24/11 at approximately noon as the meeting was drawing to a close the meeting members were saying good bye to one another. As I came up to Mr. Clark to say good bye, he hugged me extremely tightly rubbing his chest over my breasts. This was not a hug but more of a rubbing. The hug made me feel very uncomfortable.”
According to the report, Danishevskaya said she was shocked by Clark’s embrace, but didn’t mention it to him at the time as she didn’t wish to cause embarrassment. Danishevskaya said she later reported the incident to Walker, telling him that the incident left her feeling “molested.”
“I told Manager Walker about what happened in Mt. Pleasant and how it made me feel. I told him that I felt like I was molested, and that the hug made me feel uncomfortable, especially because it was coming from a Councilperson. I did tell Manager Walker that I would speak with Mr. Clark about the hug and request Mr. Clark not to hug me again, which I did on 6/28/11. I told Mr. Clark that I did not want to be hugged and that our relationship needs to remain on a professional level. Mr. Clark agreed.”
In his statement, Clark admitted that he did hug Danishevskaya, but added that he also hugged every woman in the room at the conference. Clark stated that it had been an emotional meeting for him as it marked the end of an 18-year commitment to the organization. Clark said there was never any sexual intent behind the hugs, and that he was not making any “sexual overtures.”
While both Clark and Walker denied that Danishevskaya ever mentioned that the hug had made her feel “uncomfortable” or “molested,” Walker’s statement added that it was his opinion that Danishevskaya made up the complaint as a way of covering for her poor job performance evaluation.
Three of the nine allegations made by Danishevskaya against Clark involved hugging.
Danishevskaya made three allegations against Clark regarding inappropriate email she received, one of which included a video of a topless woman shooting a gun.
“I received an appalling e-mail with a top-less woman from Mr. Clark. The e-mail I received was extremely offensive and it included a video of a topless woman shooting a gun. Please find a copy of this e-mail attached. The offensive nature of this e-mail speaks for itself and I am very offended by this e-mail. This e-mail made me feel very uncomfortable. The e-mail was absolutely unwelcome, unwanted, and unsolicited. I find the email even more offensive because I had asked Mr. Clark not to send me anything with any sexual connotations or sexual in nature. A video of a topless woman is definitely in that category.” Clark admits to having sent the email from his personal email account, but said he mistakenly sent it to Danishevskaya instead of Walker. Realizing he made a mistake, Clark said he took steps to prevent Danishevskaya from opening it, including leaving messages for her at home. Unfortunately, Danishevskaya opened it before receiving Clark’s warning.
Danishevskaya’s complaint said the email in question also included a racial slur against President Obama, one of at least two such alleged emails she received from him criticizing the president.
Clark later sent a written apology in the form of an email entitled “GOOF.”
“I know when we talked on the phone the other night that I apologized for sending you an inappropriate email,” Clark wrote. “I also asked you not to open it for it was inappropriate. As I send e-mails at times to friends and associates I sometimes do not use the common sense which I have. If you did open it, I meant in no way to offend you and if I did I am truly sorry.”
In her statement, Danishevskaya rejected the apology, saying it was her opinion that the apologetic email was not written by Clark, as it appeared to be “professionally written,” and not consistent with the way in which Clark normally pens an email message.
Allegations against Walker In June of this year, Danishevskaya alleges that Walker used inappropriate language while working together to set up a Facebook account for the village of Holly.
“I was working with Mr. Walker in his office. We were working on opening up a facebook account. Mr. Walker was sitting at his desk and I was standing bending over next to him to work on his computer when he said to me “suck me.” When I had a shocked look on my face, he then looked sheepish and said “I am sorry I said that.” He said “suck me” one other time to me while we were working together at the conference table approximately a month later.”
In his statement, Walker admitted to using the term in front of Danishevskaya, but explained that he was irritated with trying to perform the work at hand, and uttered, “suck me,” in frustration. Walker said the words were directed toward himself, and was not intended to be sexually derogatory or offensive to anyone.
The report states that Walker did, in fact, apologize for using the phrase, and denied having using the term in Danishevskaya’s presence any time after that.
Allegations against Behrens During last year’s Protect and Serve Golf Outing, Danishevskaya alleges that she was target of an ethnical slur, after Behrens referred to her as a “stupid Russian.”
“Ms. Behrens also told me that I was a ‘stupid Russian.’ This was said specifically because I was born in Russian and find it extremely rude, unprofessional and discriminatory. This comment was witnessed by other people. I find this behavior ethnically motivated and highly prejudicial to me due to my Russian heritage. On many, many occasions Ms. Behrens has made various negative facial gestures in front of me directed at me and treated me in a rude manner. This has occurred in the Village Offices and witnessed by others. I am aware of many blatant violations by Ms. Behrens of the Employee Manual and many of these are witnessed by Manager Walker.”
Clerk/Treasurer Cathrene Behre... In her statement, Behrens denied having called Danishevskaya a “stupid Russian.” Born in Detroit, Behrens said she is not culturally discriminating. Additionally, Behrens denies making negative facial gestures toward Danishevskaya, and said she neither likes nor dislikes the former chief.
In another allegation, Danishevskaya blames Walker and Behrens for creating a “hostile work environment,” and says communication with the duo was nearly nonexistent.
“I am treated differently than other Department heads by Mr. Walker and Ms. Behrens. It starts with almost all our communication being via e-mail. I have only spoken with the Village Clerk Behrens a hand full of times over the telephone in the eleven months we have worked together. Since September, I have only spoken to Manager Walker a handful of times over the telephone. The rest of the time our communication is via e-mail. The overall conduct which I have described in my complaint constitutes a hostile work environment and makes me feel uncomfortable being around them. Other employees who made a report of hostile work environment and harassment by Behrens have been laid off.”
In his statement, Walker said that ever since she was disciplined in September, Danishevskaya didn’t frequent the village offices. Walker said he communicated with Danishevskaya via email because she often did not pick up her phone when called, and that email allowed him to maintain a paper trail to job assignments or tasks assigned to her.
Attorney Richard Figura renders opinion In his 9-page analysis detailing Gibbs' findings, Figura breaks down the allegations into two groups – those against Clark, and the others against Walker and/or Behrens. In all instances, Figura finds Danishevskaya’s claims to be baseless.
Anyone wishing to read the entire report submitted by Gibbs may obtain a copy by submitting a Freedom of Information Act request with the village of Holly.
|
Comments
Along with that email service should be a policy around conduct and usage. Otherwise, allowing this to go on is a lawsuit waiting to happen.
The email is no less inappropriate for the workplace just because it was intended to go to a male recipient.
I hope that someone seriously considers action against these employees that make so many quote "MISTAKES".
When a person gets that "uncomfortable feeling" from the unwanted actions of another person, the unwanted actions are INAPPROPRIATE and should be reported.
Shame on the persons involved and their unprofessional actions/habits.
It is my opinion that it's time for a mandatory in-service training on professionalism in the workplace for all Holly public employees.
I also agree with the comments written by Joe. "Along with that email service should be a policy around conduct and usage. Otherwise, allowing this to go on is a lawsuit waiting to happen."
It would be wise to have someone come in and evaluate the whole security and privacy system for the Village of Holly.
According to the website of Simen, Figura, and Parker, P.L.C, "Mr. Figura's specialty is governmental law, and he is a former president of the Michigan Association of Municipal Attorneys. In addition to general governmental law, Mr. Figura provides assistance to public and private clients with regard to property tax assessment issues, general real estate law, eminent domain, zoning, and land use disputes."
"Mr. Figura has represented and continues to serve as general counsel for several cities, villages, and townships."
"A growing part of his practice is dedicated to alternative dispute resolution activities and he has served as an arbitrator and mediator in more than 200 cases."
I was wondering what kind of cases Mr. Figura was an arbitrator for. I did not see any harassment/sexual harassment under his specialties.
--
I'm glad that Mr. Figura enjoyed the Olympics (pg 2).
Who tells a coworker of the opposite sex that they look "scrumptious" without some intent? (pg 3)
It's comforting to know that communications intended for the village were accidently sent to Mr. Figura's cousin multiple times (pg 3). Again, separate the business and personal emails. So when a council member leaves, they retain village business in their personal email and computers? You can't operate like that. I would really love to know what is and isn't allowed to be sent via email.
With his "I hope so" comment (pg 5), Mr. Clark is clearly auditioning to replace Michael Scott on "The Office". Are we sure he didn't follow it up with a "That's what she said"?
It's clear if nothing else, the village, or at least a few members, operates in a very unprofessional manner.
It's also clear that Mr. Clark makes many "mistakes" that he later is "sorry" for, many of sexual nature that I would say amount to harassment.
And finally, Mr. Walker should probably come up with a replacement for his so beloved phrase "suck me". Maybe he can stop by the local truckstop and pick up some better phases from the bathroom stall walls.
As someone who works in this field, how the village handles information security is of concern to me.
You'd be floored to see how careless some companies are in protecting your mortgage documents or other items filled with personally identifiable information (PII). Everyone gets wound up about SSNs; I see many companies that toss those around all over the place with little to no protection.
Earlier in the year I received notice that despite my water bill being setup for direct withdrawal from my checking account, the village did not have record of my bank information.
Well I obviously provided my checking account information at one point, so where did it go?
...maybe it was emailed to someone's cousin.
1) What was the determination of the former chief's performance reviews, and were there any disciplinary actions on her record of employment? Where do these fall under the timeline of her complaint and the "vote of no confidence"?
2) The Village Council instituted a code of conduct/ethics in this last term. How does this factor into the actions of Mr. Walker, Mrs. Behrens, and especially Mr. Clark?
3) When Mr. Walker and Mr. Clark visited Memphis, Mich., during the hiring process, they spoke with many citizens who gave glowing references. Did they speak with any Memphis police officers, administrators, or people from peer agencies (i.e. the State Police or the Sheriff's Dept.?) in regards to her administrative capacity?
4) In regards to the "vote of no confidence", did the signing officers and dispatchers bring up their concerns to Sgt. Story or Sgt. Sano when they occurred, or did their union steward bring these issues with either the Chief or Mr. Walker directly? (If the chief was "not timely" in her complaints, wouldn't that stipulation also apply here).
I think there's still a lot to understand about all of this...
There have been many claims that the No Confidence letter was retribution by Mr Walker for the hrassment issue, but as there never seemed to be any love for Mr Walker by the members Holly police department, judging by the level of tension in any of the council meetings attended by officers, I wonder how it could be that they submitted this Vote of No Confidence letter to protect Mr Walker?
Something doesn't add up here, so I am going to be real interested in seeing the report from the Sheriff's Department.
One of the council members raised a number of questions regarding these types of issues with the village manager before he was hired, however shut down by others on the council as just rumors or bad blood.
There were questions that needed to be answered before they hire anyone that were not, which seems to be standard operating procedure with the Village council.
Maybe those that shut down the investigation of Mr Walker will be willing to pay any settlement awarded?
thehollyexpress.com/.../...
In other news, this situation made the 11pm WXYZ news last night complete with a lengthy interview of the Chief and an explanation of the allegations - there is a clip online for those of you interested in seeing how much further our little village can be drug into the mud. Mr. Walker and Mr. Clark declined to comment. There are a couple nice shots of our downtown but otherwise, this certainly shines a spotlight on Holly and lets us be known, once again, as a troubled community (close to Flint). Way to go Village, way to go.
wxyz.com/.../...
And, thirdly, he has no control over police officers or council members for that matter...are we on a witch hunt in this village?? Furthermore, Mr Figura is an experienced lawyer, and reports to a much higher ethic authority at the State level and he is not going to risk his license and reputation for this village. Just because you don't like what someone says or does does not constitute sexual harrassment in the eyes of the law. Plain and simple fact.
In that short time I have seen some changes in leadership that I feel are a step in the wrong direction and now the police chief who returned my calls personally (something you would NEVER have happen in Farmington Hills) forced out by a group of people who have already admitted to engaging in less than ethical conduct in their dealings with the chief.
I love alot of things about Holly. It is a wonderful quiet (when car bombs aren't going off) town with some great people and my little outpost of business is doing very well.
However until the small minded lifers that are in charge of this town are forced out there will never be any incentive for anyone with fresh, 21st century ideas to even attempt to get involved in local government.
(edited to remove some harsh words that took away from my message...change is needed!)
Agreed. In a community the size of Holly every vote does truly count.
She should not have resigned if in fact these were trumped up charges, but I doubt the truth will ever come out now. As for being able to contact the Chiefs of police in Holly, this is nothing new all the folks that have served in that capacity in the last 25 years have been accessible, that is one of the advantages of small town living.
Their so called code of ethics says clearly to treat officials ect with respect..Both clark and walker admitted partially to their "goofs" but yet neither of them are being diciplined.
As far as Elaynas comment about having to work in a "hostile" enviornment, I agree that after seeing how annoyed some of the officers get if you call the police department to report a ordinance violation I can only imagine what it would be like to work with some of them ..In my opinion we all would be better off if the Oakland county sheriff department took over and we have them to protect us..
RSS feed for comments to this post