Chief Elena Danishevskaya HOLLY, Michigan – Holly Chief of Police Elena Danishevskaya is off the job, at least temporarily until the Oakland County Sheriff’s Department can investigate allegations made by 12 members of the police officers’ union which were included in a letter to Village Manager Jerry Walker entitled, “Vote of No Confidence.”
According to a press release issued by the village of Holly on Sept. 4, the “Vote of No Confidence” letter cites 19 separate incidents of actions or inactions on the part of Danishevskaya which the signers allege amount to mismanagement of the police department policies and procedures.
The letter was referred to Village Attorney Richard Figura for review and investigation. Figura, in turn, referred the complaint on to the Oakland County Sheriff’s Department for a full investigation and the eventual submission of a report of its findings to members of the Holly Village Council.
“Having the Oakland County Sheriff’s Department conduct the investigation ensures that it will be performed by a neutral third party with police department management experience,” the press release reads. “The investigation by the Sheriff’s Department will be performed by a unit within the department with experience in handling such investigations and will be at no cost to the village.”
In the meantime, the press release says, Danishevskaya has been placed on paid administrative leave, pending the outcome of the investigation. Additionally, the Sheriff’s Department has made the investigation a top priority, and has promised village officials that it will report back as quickly as possible while protecting the rights of all involved.
Danishevskaya responds to press release
“The following is my response to the Village of Holly Press Release issued on September 4, 2012.
I have been placed on administrative leave solely in retaliation for my having filed a complaint of sex discrimination and sexual harassment against the Holly Village Manager Jerry Walker and Holly Council Member Thomas Clark. The complaint was filed in writing the week of March 11th, 2012 per the Village of Holly Policies and Procedures. It included my concerns that Councilman Thomas Clark had sent me sexually explicit emails including a video of a topless woman shooting a handgun, made sexually inappropriate comments to me and hugged me inappropriately. I also expressed concerns that the Village Manager Jerry Walker treated me differently then male Department Heads as well as treating me in a discriminating matter.
Almost six months after my complaint was made, on August 23rd, 2012, the Village finally got around to issuing its findings, which are required by the policy. The Village found against me on every one of my more than 20 different allegations. On the SAME DAY, I received an undated letter which is referred to as a vote of no confidence. The things listed are not violations of policies and procedures and are a clear attempt to create a record against me. Some of things listed date back over one year ago, and were never mentioned at the time. Several are just flat out misstatements. I have responded in writing to each one.
It is clear to me that since the day I filed my complaint of discrimination, Village Manager Walker has made his mind up to get rid of me. The latest press release, which is inaccurate, and leaves out important information, and my being placed on an administrative leave is further evidence of that.
I have submitted my letter of resignation to the Village.”
Sgt. Michael Story is currently the acting Chief of Police.
|
Comments
They'd probably be more capable than the current crowd...
I see from the village website that the email addresses published for council members are personal email addresses through various providers such as Comcast, Hotmail, Gmail, etc.
Does the village not have it's own email system or provider? If not, I should hope that council communications do not occur via these email accounts (which I would suspect they do).
Aside from being just another example of unprofessionalism, using personal email for business can be a legal and eDiscovery nightmare.
Second of all, until the following documents/information are released: the Chief's complaint, the findings of that investigation (including who investigated), the "vote of no confidence" (including who signed it), the findings of the Oakland County Sheriff's office and the Chief's actual response to that letter........no one is in a position to decide guilt or innocence, right or wrongdoing, or any other impose any other value judgments.
The Chief was a very involved and popular figure in Holly, so I understand completely the outpouring of emotion and opinions on this matter. But it doesn't serve anyone to perpetuate rumors, speak off the cuff or fuel the fires with criticism or more allegations until we have the necessary information.
Instead of throwing stones, we should be both persistent and patient as we press to have more details made public. Then we can move forward.
However since no one here knows what is in this letter of no confidence,and also don't know the details of the Chief's complaint, well other than what she stated in her letter after she was placed in administrative leave, why is everyone going off half cocked?
Has anyone stopped to wonder if maybe there is more to this than is being printed here in the paper and maybe there is something to both claims or neither?
How about we all let the Sheriff do their investigation before making statements in regards to anyone's guilt or innocence?
If Chief Danishevskaya decides to remain in law enforcement the only real winner in this conflict will be the city that she decides to work for.
Good luck in whatever you decide & we only wish you the best!
What several of us are saying is; Why weren't the allegations against Mr Walker & Mr Clark investigated at the time? Investigated by someone other than The Council. It seems many of us don't understand why they are still allowed to represent our community until this matter is resolved. It just doesn't make sense to me! I understand we don't have all the facts, but it seems the Chief didn't get the same benefit of the doubt that those "Good 'ol boys" got.
I ask where you received your information as to who investigated the sexual harassment claims and where it was that you received the information on how quickly the investigation started after the claims were made. These are details of the sexual harassment issue that weren't reported by Amy.
There are a lot of details missing from this story and I caution anyone from jumping to conclusions or making assumptions.
Has anyone verified who performed the investigation and who declared the findings regarding the Chief's claims other than the Chief?
I understand the release of details has been slow, but knowing that details have been limited we have to consider what we do know and what the source of that information is.
I am not saying that Elena has been intentionally deceitful or has intentionally lied. I am not even saying she is wrong. All I am saying is that things are being assumed based on a claim that hasn't been verified.
"A sexual harassment complaint was filed in March 2012, the complaint was investigated by a third party according to the sexual harassment policy for the Village of Holly."
And like I said earlier, I have placed a FOIA request with the village of Holly for the entire report and legal costs associated with the investigation in question. Clerk/Treasurer Cathy Behrens informed me today that Village Attorney Mike Gildner is currently reviewing the information, and that he will be getting back with the village sometime during the first part of this week.
That, in fact, was one of the items off of which I based my assumption that the Village was the entity that conducted the investigation of allegations made by the former Chief. That and the fact that other sources, specifically an article in the Detroit Free Press, state that the former chief's allegations "..were determined by the village attorney in August to be unfounded ... ". Is our Village attorney the one that should be making that determination? Does the Free Fress have all the facts? I don't know for sure. I only know that I'm not comfortable with Mr. Figura making the determination that sexual harrasment claims made by the Chief are "unfounded", yet sending off a vote-of-no-confidence letter to OCS for a "full investigation". I feel that OCS should have also conducted the investigation into the allegations filed by our former Chief. If our Village's sexual harassment policy allows our attorney to investigate claims made against other Village officials without bringing in OCS, then I believe a change may be necessary to avoid any future impropriety, or even the perception of it.
There have been a number of details reported incorrectly. It has been reported that the village council voted to place Chief Danishevskaya on paid administrative leave during the week of 8/26. This issue wasn't discussed at the 8/28 council meeting (the last time council was together where a vote could have been held).
Jason,
Of course. That makes sense. I had assumed he wasn't until I read the Free Press article. Unfortunately, all we have to go on is what we're reading in the papers. Although I'm curious as to the identity of the third-party. I guess I'll be at the meeting tomorrow in case the subject happens to come up.
Chris
To provide further details and new events regarding this, it was stated by the attorney at last night's council meeting that the investigation and reports were subject to the FoIA. I am sure more of those details will be reported soon.
All these claims and counterclaims, accusations and rumors are frankly childish. I do find a couple of things regarding these issues a bit strange, however I am going to wait and see what is in the Sheriff's report before I say anything here.
We should be concerned that justice be done one way or the other, I don't care if you or I or anyone else loved or hated the police chief, the village manager or the village council, if there was a problem in either instance we need to see that it is corrected no matter who was too blame or how I feel about them.
RSS feed for comments to this post