Friday, May 18th 2012
 

Latest Comments

RSS

More Area News

Holly WaterWorks: A building worth saving?

Print
Written by Amy Mayhew
Thursday, January 12 2012

HOLLY, Michigan – For more than five years, a village-mandated “UNSAFE – ENTER AT YOUR OWN RISK” sign has hung on the door of Holly’s historical WaterWorks building. The sign was placed there in 2006 after Holly’s former Fire Chief Jack Hollands was seriously injured by falling through the wooden plank flooring into the basement of the building.

Having sat dormant for more than a half decade, the topic of what to do about the historical building once again came to the forefront, this time in the form of a public hearing held during Tuesday’s Village Council meeting.


History of the WaterWorks Building
Kayakers and canoeists are familiar with the old WaterWorks building as it sits on the west side of Broad Street, adjacent to the Mill Pond, and the Shiawassee River.


Historically, Holly’s waterworks system was the first public waterworks system in Oakland County, dating back to 1869, and possibly the first municipal waterworks system in the state of Michigan, according to Sue Julian, president of the Headwaters Trails organization.

Julian said the building was constructed in response to fires that swept through the village of Holly in the 1870s. Originally, water was piped to homes with a spigot that simply ran all of the time. Back then, there wasn’t a charge for water.

Over the years, the village of Holly installed more pumping capacity, added filtration and chlorination processes, and began charging residents for water.

The area where the WaterWorks building now sits was the original site of Stiff’s Mill. Eventually, The Milling Company expanded its operations across Broad Street with a lumber mill stretching nearly to Hadley Street. There they manufactured barrel staves to contain Holly Velvet Flour produced at The Milling Company.

To date, the WaterWorks building houses a Leffel turbine horizontal waterwheel. While historians do not believe it is the original wheel, it is thought to date back to approximately 1910.


The Holly Milling Company originally had multiple waterwheels. It is believed the current basement of the WaterWorks building was once a part of the The Milling Company basement. The wooden part of the building may predate the brick portion, and is visible in old photographs of The Milling Company. The WaterWorks turbine powered The Milling Company, and subsequently, Holly’s waterworks system.

After Holly Milling Company burned down in December of 1910, the loss was so great, that owners opted not to rebuild.

The WaterWorks building continued to pump water throughout the 1970s. Along with the turbine and waterwheel driven pump, other components appear to still be in good enough repair to warrant restoration.


Residents want action

Several residents attended Tuesday’s Village Council meeting, specifically for the purpose of voicing their opinions on the potential fate of the WaterWorks building.

Sherylyn Everly is a member of Holly’s Environmental Committee, lives in close proximity to the building, and said it’s time for the village of Holly to make a commitment to the building – one way or the other.

“That building is a liability to the village of Holly as it stands right now,” she said. “We’d like to see it either turned into an asset, or get it off the books.” Over the years, Everly said she has witnessed several other attempts to improve the building with minimal results.

“It’s basically an attractive nuisance, and it’s an accident waiting to happen,” she said. “The waterworks wheel is the very most important thing historically that’s in the building, and I thoroughly agree that it’s worth preserving.”

Calling for a “purposeful use,” Everly suggested reinstating the wheel to produce electricity again, pulling the wheel out of the building and making it into a pedestal for WaterWorks Park, or donating it to an entity that will restore it for historical purposes.

“If anything is going to happen, it must have the commitment by council made – whether it’s restoring or demolishing – council has to back the decision,” she said.

Other residents like Marlo Davidson, Park Commissioner Joyce Leece, and downtown business owner Lisa Clark spoke during the meeting in support of saving the building and its contents.

“That building happens to be one of five over many years that has been considered to be an asset for a possible historic site for families to visit when they come to Holly,” Davidson said.  Davidson recalled a similar situation with the Holly Mill. “It was a long wait for something positive to happen with the mill,” she said. “But if we have to privatize (the WaterWorks building) like we did the mill, so be it, but I would like to see it saved.”

Leece agreed. “There’s nothing I would like more than to see the building restored,” she said. “But the sad truth is, the Park Commission has no money – I don’t mean we don’t have very much money – we have no money.”   

Speaking from the podium, Sue Julian presented council members with seven reasons for keeping and restoring the WaterWorks building.


In addition to the building being central to Holly’s history, Julian said the building has been recognized and supported by the Shiawassee Historical Preservation Organization, the National Parks Service, the Saginaw Bay Watershed Initiative Network, and many local researchers.

Julian said the WaterWorks building could potentially become a “Welcome to Holly” site, noting that author Doc Fletcher named Holly and the Shiawassee River as one of Michigan’s “hidden beauties” in his book, “Paddling Michigan’s Hidden Beauty: the River, the Towns, the Taverns.” In discussing the Shiawassee River, Fletcher also lists several local shops and eateries in Holly.

“It could also be a living museum with artifacts that people have collected over the years that have to do with that building and the waterworks and power generation,” Julian said.


With an outpouring of citizen support, Julian said she believes the WaterWorks building is a “feasible restoration” as supported by already-completed Aprecis Engineering renderings of the building and by that fact that it houses a working turbine, governor, and wooden gears. “There is deterioration of course, but it’s comparable to other sites that have been neglected and have been restored in the past,” she said.

Julian said a significant investment in preservation has already occurred with the building, including documenting its history, making site improvements including signage, a pedestrian bridge, a canoe launch and walking paths, roof and window maintenance, and ongoing cutting and curing of lumber to be used for the eventual roof rebuilding project.

“The recommendation from our group – and remember we’re not a restoration group, but we are a group that would like to see that area preserved with historic context – would be to appoint a study committee to outline alternatives for council and to bring to your attention specific information.”


The building is secure

Rumors that the WaterWorks building was being accessed by area youth were squelched on Wednesday, as Julian, and local businessmen John Lauve and Randy Pierce toured the exterior of the building with Holly Chief of Police, Elena Danishevskaya.


With the windows and doorways of the building thoroughly nailed shut or locked, the group observed no visible access points.

The front door of the facility is securely locked, and access to the building is regulated by the village of Holly until such time the building is deemed to be safe for entry.






WaterWorks citizen ad hoc committee forms

As of Tuesday evening, Julian said nine volunteers had signed on to be a part of a citizens' ad hoc committee to discuss the alternatives pertaining to the WaterWorks building.

“This whole process is really in its beginning stages,” Julian said. “At this point, we’re simply a group of concerned citizens that have formed an ad hoc committee – we’re hoping that council will formally appoint a WaterWorks committee in the days ahead.”

Those still wishing to join the committee may contact Julian at (248) 634-3513.


Comments  

 
+11 #1 vhogan Thursday, January 12 2012 6:58pm
Great story, Amy! I never knew that building had so much history. I love the idea of a visitor's center.
Report to administrator
 
 
-7 #2 Joe Thursday, January 12 2012 11:42pm
Thanks for the history lesson; it's nice to learn about these things.

My favorite line from the article: "back then, there wasn’t a charge for water". Holly really was the place to be in the 1870s!

Can't say I see it holding much value for the village in the future though. If a private organization would be willing to take on the restoration with some type of usage that would create value for the residents, I'd say give it to them.
Report to administrator
 
 
-12 #3 Janet Leslie Friday, January 13 2012 12:08am
I agree with Vera. Its location just inside the village limits as entered from the south, as well as it's location in a park often used by visitors to the village, make it an ideal structure to showcase Holly's history and appeal. Where the money for a renovation would come from, I do not know.
Report to administrator
 
 
-12 #4 Ryan Bladzik Friday, January 13 2012 8:29am
There are plenty of sources of funding that could be sought out to restore the building. Since it is historical in nature, I'm sure there are countless preservation and restoration grants if someone is willing to put the time into research and applying for them. The building also falls within the DDA district, so there might be some help with resources (if not direct funding) there.

What's most encouraging is that a volunteer group emerged with a goal to develop a restoration plan within a set time-period. If they follow through on that, then there's little doubt that the funding will be found and restoring the building will go from "talk" to "reality".
Report to administrator
 
 
-10 #5 Phil Friday, January 13 2012 11:30am
A visitor center would be great. So would a community center. Or more recreational opportunities. Whatever happened with the Holly Depot? We're there restorations efforts for that? How did that go? Intentions and ideas are swell. But right now I don't think creating a visitor center should rank high on any municipal list.
Report to administrator
 
 
-6 #6 Toddski Friday, January 13 2012 11:52am
Altho I agree it would be nice to preserve the structure for historical purposes,I have observed very little use of the park with the exception of boaters launching their boats on the Shiawassee River, also its not even within walking distance to downtown. Perhaps mounting the waterwheel with an historical plaque giving its history would be more practical? However, the Holly VIllage can't afford any of this; Is it possible the townhip could help with this? It was used by all, and sits at the boundry line between the Village and Township... Just my thoughts.
Report to administrator
 
 
-5 #7 Ryan Bladzik Friday, January 13 2012 1:28pm
Toddski and Phil, this doesn't have to be a municipal or government project, and I don't think during the three times the topic's come up just this week that has been proposed.

If Mrs. Julian and the other volunteers want to spearhead the effort, all the more power to them and they should have the community's support.
Report to administrator
 
 
-12 #8 Janet Leslie Friday, January 13 2012 6:12pm
Personally,I wouldn't envision a "visitor's center," per se in the building. But something that provides insight into the history of what is actually there, and how it relates to the larger history of the Holly area, seems appropriate. As for those boaters launching into the Shiawassee, those are very valuable visitors. It would be to our advantage as a community to impress them long enough to entice them to stay a while and invest a little more time discovering Holly. They might just spend a few dollars here, and eventually maybe some of them will decide they'd like to live here.
Report to administrator
 
 
+5 #9 Autumn Friday, January 13 2012 7:59pm
The group is going to meet at the Holly Mill tomorrow (Saturday Jan 14th)at 3:00
If you care to volunteer please come by.
They are delegating and discussing the fact finding mission to see if it is viable and cost effective to save it over demolishing, and they hope it can be salvaged
Report to administrator
 
 
-9 #10 Lee Friday, January 13 2012 8:47pm
The village council has deemed the building needs to be restored or demolished..that seems to me like a municipal project! Also, I don't think boaters will stay in town because of a water wheel... Our best best is to find some organization that will take on this project..
Report to administrator
 
 
-8 #11 Janet Leslie Saturday, January 14 2012 8:13pm
Really? You don't think that people will be more likely to explore Holly if it appears to be a well-cared for community with a rich history and enough pride to maintain its assets, as opposed to a little-known village with a dilapidated, boarded up building in the park? I think these things make a difference to visitors.
Report to administrator
 
 
+1 #12 Lee Saturday, January 14 2012 9:27pm
Janet, have you driven down some of our"well-cared for" streets lately??
The boarded up waterwheel building has been neglected for some years..Now the village wants to determine if it is to be restored or destroyed..I do hope the community will support the newly formed committee as it searches to come up with a sound, feasible plan.
Report to administrator
 
 
-13 #13 Toddski Sunday, January 15 2012 2:56pm
Janet, I have to agree with Lee. Are you aware that there is no ordinance enforcement in the Village at this time? Concerns about a small building at the southern border of our Village is the least of of our worries. Yes, it would be nice to rehabilitate the Water Works Building; but it would also be nice to have some of our neighborhood streets repaired. Also, it would be nice to have some of the dilapidated homes in the downtown area repaired and cleaned up. With the Village's limited finances, we can't do all we might want to do. .Hopefully, our citizens or an interested party will come forward.
Report to administrator
 
 
-12 #14 Janet Leslie Monday, January 16 2012 11:51pm
I don't think the village is intending to finance the proposed rehabilitation of the Water Works Building, so it is not as if municipal funds would be diverted from some other more worthy project. I agree that blight is a problem throughout the village, and to a lesser extent throughout the outer township,and that the more we clean it up, the more inviting our community will be. I do, however, think that areas that attract visitors from outside the community, such as Water Works Park, are areas where rehabilitation efforts have the potential to reap the greatest benefits for the community.

As for a moratorium on ordinance enforcement in the village, I have not heard of that.
Report to administrator
 
 
+10 #15 amayhew Tuesday, January 17 2012 8:08am
I haven't heard anything about the code enforcement allegation, either, but I will be looking into it today.
Report to administrator
 
 
+1 #16 Jason M Hughes Tuesday, January 17 2012 8:49am
I think it is important to remember where we are in the process. The public hearing was to determine if there was a desire to keep the building (or some aspect of it) or if the overwhelming consensus is to tear it down.

It sounds like the majority wish to do something with it. The next step is to develop project costs and see what options make the most sense for the community.
Report to administrator
 
 
-10 #17 Toddski Tuesday, January 17 2012 10:57am
No.1, No one mentioned anything about a moratorium on code enforcement...No.2, I'm afraid that any "Project Cost" is more then the village could afford at this time.
Report to administrator
 
 
-4 #18 Ryan Bladzik Tuesday, January 17 2012 11:20am
Toddski, you said yourself that codes aren't enforced in the Village, a statement of which lends itself to sounding like an official position of the Village.

Quoting Toddski:
Are you aware that there is no ordinance enforcement in the Village at this time?



No one also ever mentioned that the Village intended, or was able, to take the lead responsibility for this issue, financially or otherwise. The Village owns the building as a part of the parks system--that is the extent to what has been established. A citizen's volunteer group has been created to explore options.
Report to administrator
 
 
-12 #19 Toddski Tuesday, January 17 2012 12:32pm
Ryan, if this was an official position of the Village I would of said so - it was just something I'M aware of. Sound have said enforcement of ordinances..
"lends itself to sounding like an official", please don't read anything into my comment that's not there.
Report to administrator
 
 
+3 #20 Jason M Hughes Tuesday, January 17 2012 1:08pm
Quoting Toddski:
No.2, I'm afraid that any "Project Cost" is more then the village could afford at this time.


The process isn't to that stage yet. Any action on the building or the park has to come to the village because it is village property. If a civic, conservation or volunteer group wishes to put together a project plan or project options and present it to the village then they are free to do so (and it costs nothing of the village at this point). The village hasn't committed any funds to the project and to my knowledge, there hasn't been a financial request made of the village at this point.
Report to administrator
 
 
-1 #21 circus011574 Tuesday, January 17 2012 2:22pm
The building is an eyesore; it is not interesting architecturally at all. Turn it into a museum or visitor center or whatever and nobody will visit. The village should put it up for sale and see what kind of interest there is. Maybe a private entity could come up with a good use for the land. Then it would be their responsibility to demolish the building. Maybe someone could run a small canoe rental business or something there. Save the wheel and sell it to Cracker Barrel.
Report to administrator
 
 
0 #22 Ladyhawke Wednesday, February 15 2012 12:28pm
I was born and raised on Broad Street (711) and would really hate to see Holly lose this historical building. I hope it all works out. Jackie Hitchcock (Lowe)
Report to administrator
 

To comment on this article, please register for an account or log-in if you already have an account.

 



Front Page | Community | Sports and Outdoors | Opinion | Education | Holly Express | Site Map
©2012 The Holly Express.
Send feedback to Editor@theHollyExpress.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be broadcast, published, rewritten or redistributed without prior written permission.